Antony Waste Q1 FY27: consolidated PAT sinks 97% YoY on WtE costs; standalone still grows
PAT -96.74% YoY · revenue +5.52% · margins compressing
₹260.99 Cr
+5.52% YoY
₹0.75 Cr
-96.74% YoY
0.28%
-8.7pp YoY
₹0.27
Antony Waste Handling Cell's consolidated Q1 FY27 (quarter ended 30 June 2026) print is a sharp profitability miss: PAT fell 96.7% YoY to ₹0.75 Cr from ₹22.96 Cr in Q1 FY26, even as revenue from operations grew 5.5% YoY to ₹260.99 Cr and total income rose to ₹268.83 Cr. PBT collapsed 94.8% YoY to just ₹1.34 Cr. Operating margin (OPM) compressed roughly 800 bps YoY to 14.26% from 22.26%, well outside management's 20-23% guided EBITDA-margin band, and revenue growth of 5.5% trails the 15-18% FY27 growth guidance given on the February 2026 concall — both explicit misses against prior guidance. No consensus street estimate for this quarter's PAT or revenue could be confirmed, so the vsStreet read is unknown rather than assumed.
Q1 FY-2027 vs prior quarters
The weakness is concentrated at the subsidiary (Waste-to-Energy) level rather than the core business: standalone PAT actually grew 18% YoY to ₹1.37 Cr on 8.2% revenue growth to ₹158.78 Cr, while consolidated finance costs jumped 34.9% YoY to ₹21.43 Cr and depreciation rose 8.1% to ₹22.28 Cr. Isolating subsidiaries (consolidated minus standalone), their revenue grew just 1.6% YoY to ₹102.2 Cr while their finance costs surged ~85% YoY to ₹14.0 Cr — consistent with management's own framing that the ₹600-650 Cr Andhra Pradesh WtE capex will not generate revenue until FY29, so the associated debt is loading interest and depreciation onto the P&L well ahead of any offsetting income. Sequential (QoQ) revenue (-8.7%) and PAT (-98%) look even steeper, but the company's own note flags the March-2026 quarter figures as a balancing/true-up between audited full-year and 9-month numbers, making YoY the cleaner read this quarter.
The stock went into the print at ₹422, down 9.2% over the past month of trading.
Management reiterates a long-term revenue growth target of 20% CAGR, supported by recent major contract wins in Mumbai (C&T) and Andhra Pradesh (Waste-to-Energy), and guides for 15-18% revenue growth in the next fiscal year. The company expects to maintain a healthy EBITDA margin profile between 20% and 23%, driven by
— This quarter: missed
On the corporate side, the Board fixed executive director Shiju Jacob Kallarakal's term for five years and approved a 26% stake acquisition in Arts EV this quarter; the 25th AGM is set for 20 August 2026 with a dividend record date of 13 August. On litigation/receivables, the Supreme Court dismissed a municipal corporation's Special Leave Petition, upholding a ₹15 Cr conciliation claim, while a separate ₹19.47 Cr overdue receivable from another municipal body saw ₹5.02 Cr recovered this quarter. No management press release accompanying this result was available to cross-check against the reported numbers. Subsequent to the quarter, on 8 July 2026, a landslide/force-majeure event at the Pimpri Chinchwad (Pune) WtE facility damaged the administrative building and caused casualties; core processing resumed 28 July but WtE operations await OEM certification, and the company says the financial impact — net of insurance — cannot yet be estimated and will be booked in the September-2026 quarter, adding a fresh overhang heading into Q2.
W1
Q2 FY27 P&L impact of the 8 July 2026 PCMC WtE facility force-majeure event (asset damage/compensation, net of insurance) — company says it cannot be reliably estimated yet and will be booked next quarter.
W2
Whether consolidated OPM recovers toward the 20-23% guided band as WtE subsidiary debt/depreciation season — printed 14.26% this quarter vs 22.26% a year ago.
W3
Collection pace on the remaining ₹19.47 Cr municipal receivable after ₹5.02 Cr recovered this quarter.
Converted from ₹ Lakhs; consol PAT is pre-NCI (row 7, matches DB YoY basis) — owners-only PAT was ₹0.76 Cr; standalone diverges sharply (+18% YoY PAT) from consolidated (-97% YoY) due to WtE-subsidiary finance/depreciation costs; 8-Jul-2026 PCMC WtE facility force-majeure event (post quarter-end) not reflected in these numbers; Q4 FY26 comparative is a balancing/true-up figure per company note 2, so QoQ is less reliable than YoY.
Informational and educational content only. Not investment advice.