StockWatch
·
Industrials · Salasar Techno · BSE 540642

ED attaches ₹98.31 Cr of Salasar's plant assets for 180 days; company says business continues as normal

A PMLA order attaches the Bhilai plant and a Prayagraj solar plant — ₹98.31 Cr, ≈11.6% of market cap — for 180 days. Neither the company nor its directors is named as an accused.

SALASARSalasar Techno Engineering Ltd16 Sept 2026 · 4 min read
Last close

₹4.84 Sep 16 · +1.3% on the day

Size tier

SMALL-CAP by market cap ≈ ₹846 Cr

Value attached

₹98.31 Cr

≈11.6% of market cap

Attachment period

180 days

order dated Sep 12, 2026

From 52-wk high

−56.0% adjusted high ₹10.99 (Oct 30, 2025)

52-wk low

₹4.72

set Sep 15, 2026 — the session before the filing

After market hours on September 15, Salasar Techno Engineering told the exchanges it had received a Provisional Attachment Order from the Directorate of Enforcement under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The order, dated September 12, provisionally attaches immovable properties of the company worth ₹98,31,25,000 — i.e. ₹98.31 crore — for 180 days. Against a market capitalisation of roughly ₹846 crore (174.80 crore shares at the ₹4.84 close), that is about 11.6% of the company's market value placed under restriction.

What happened

The order, and the two properties it covers

+1.3% (Sep 16, first session after the filing)
legal

ED issues Provisional Attachment Order under PMLA covering ₹98.31 Cr of company properties

The company received a Provisional Attachment Order dated September 12, 2026, issued by the Directorate of Enforcement under Section 5(1) of the PMLA. It provisionally attaches two immovable properties — the Bhilai manufacturing plant in Durg, Chhattisgarh (₹40.95 Cr of its ₹66.47 Cr value) and a solar power plant at Naini, Prayagraj, UP owned by erstwhile EMC Limited (₹57.36 Cr of its ₹101.53 Cr value) — for 180 days, restricting their transfer, disposition, removal or dealing except as specifically permitted under applicable law. The filing states that neither the company nor its Chairman and Managing Director has been summoned or named as an accused in the prosecution complaint filed by the ED.

Read:The order restricts dealing in the assets; it does not, on the filing's account, stop production — the company states the PAO is not likely to disrupt business operations and that business continues in the normal course. The attachment is provisional and time-bound at 180 days from the order.

BSE filing, Sep 15, 2026 (19:54 IST)

The disclosure is explicitly a continuation of an earlier one: on April 17, 2025 the company had disclosed ED search proceedings conducted on April 16, 2025 at the residential premises of Chairman Alok Kumar and Managing Director Shashank Agarwal. Seventeen months later, that matter has produced an attachment order on company property. The filing describes the alleged violation only as a contravention of Section 5(1) of the PMLA, and records that both directors have extended full cooperation and provided the information, documents and clarifications sought.

Properties under the Provisional Attachment Order · ₹ Cr
PropertyTotal valueValue attached
Bhilai manufacturing plant, Durg, Chhattisgarh (owned by the company)66.4740.95
Solar power plant, Naini, Prayagraj, UP (owned by erstwhile EMC Ltd)101.5357.36
Total16898.31

Values as stated in the filing in rupees (e.g. ₹66,46,60,000 = ₹66.47 Cr; ₹98,31,25,000 = ₹98.31 Cr), converted to crore.

One detail worth noticing in the table: the larger of the two attached assets is not a legacy Salasar property. The Naini solar plant belonged to erstwhile EMC Limited, which Salasar had acquired for ₹178 crore and held as a wholly owned subsidiary, with the NCLT scheme's Appointed Date of October 23, 2024. EMC was formally amalgamated into Salasar effective July 22, 2026 — a legal merger of an asset that had already been inside the Salasar group for well over a year, not a fresh acquisition ahead of the ED order dated September 12, 2026.

The filing's exact language on culpability
The Company further submits that neither the Company nor the aforesaid Directors has been summoned/ named as an accused in the prosecution complaint filed by the ED in connection with the aforesaid proceedings under the PMLA.

Salasar Techno Engineering — Regulation 30 intimation to BSE/NSE, September 15, 2026

The tape

The stock was already at a 52-week low before the order became public

₹, daily close (adjusted)
4.635.035.435.826.224.8408-0308-1308-2509-0409-16−10.1% on 4.0 Cr shares52-wk low ₹4.72 · ED order filed after close+1.3% first session after filing
Salasar Techno (BSE 540642), split/bonus-adjusted daily closes, Aug 3 – Sep 16, 2026. Source: BSE daily series.

The sequencing matters. The filing reached the exchanges at 19:54 IST on September 15 — after the close — so nothing in that day's trading was a reaction to it. Yet that same session the stock printed its 52-week adjusted low of ₹4.72 and closed at ₹4.78, capping a slide that began in early September: on September 3 the stock fell 10.1% (₹5.65 to ₹5.08) on 4.0 crore shares, its heaviest volume of the period. The company's exchange filings around those dates were routine — newspaper publications, the FY26 annual report, the AGM notice — none of which references the decline, so the pack offers no filing-based explanation for it. The first session after the ED disclosure, September 16, closed up 1.3% at ₹4.84 on light volume of about 18.7 lakh shares. The measurable market reaction to the order, so far, is close to nil — against a stock already down 56% from its October 2025 adjusted high of ₹10.99.

The financials underneath

Thin profits make ₹98 crore a large number here

₹ Cr, quarterly consolidated revenue
0166332.01498.01300.17Q1 FY26PAT 8.80427.17Q2 FY26PAT 15.99330.78Q3 FY26PAT 6.51444.65Q4 FY26PAT −13.67295.54Q1 FY27PAT 5.14
Consolidated quarterly revenue with net profit in the sub-label, ₹ Cr. Q4 FY26 was a consolidated net loss of ₹13.67 Cr (standalone was a ₹13.62 Cr profit the same quarter). Source: exchange filings.

Scale is the context for the ₹98.31 crore figure. Consolidated revenue in the latest quarter (Q1 FY27) was ₹295.54 crore, but net profit was just ₹5.14 crore, with interest expense of ₹15.24 crore eating most of the operating cushion — pre-tax profit was ₹3.65 crore. Q4 FY26 swung to a consolidated net loss of ₹13.67 crore. The attached value is thus roughly nineteen times the latest quarter's profit, even if it is only a third of one quarter's revenue. Separately, the shareholding pattern shows promoter holding fell from 47.24% (82.57 crore shares) as of March 31, 2026 to 44.50% (77.78 crore shares) as of June 30, 2026, while FII holdings rose from 8.68 crore to 10.31 crore shares over the same period — the filings in hand do not state the mechanics of that change.

What to watch

The filings that would change this picture

  • The 180-day clock

    The attachment runs 180 days from the order dated September 12, 2026 — into March 2027. Any Regulation 30 disclosure on the order being confirmed, modified, or lapsing is the single most important next filing.

  • Accused status

    The company's statement that neither it nor its directors has been summoned or named as an accused holds as of September 15. Any change would arrive as a fresh exchange disclosure.

  • Operations in the numbers

    The company states business continues in the normal course. Q2 FY27 results are the first data that can corroborate that — watch revenue and any commentary tied to the Bhilai plant or the Naini solar asset.

  • AGM, Sep 30

    The 25th AGM is scheduled for September 30, 2026 via video conference (e-voting Sep 26–29) — the first shareholder forum after the order.

What is established: the ED has provisionally attached ₹98.31 crore of Salasar's immovable property — a little under 12% of its market value, spread over the Bhilai plant and a recently merged-in solar asset — for 180 days, in a matter that traces to searches at the directors' residences in April 2025. What the filing equally establishes: no prosecution complaint names the company or the directors as accused, and the company says operations continue unaffected.

The order is provisional and time-bound, and the market's first-session response was a 1.3% uptick in a stock already at its 52-week low. Whether this stays a disclosure footnote or becomes an operational constraint depends entirely on the filing trail from here — the 180-day window, any change in accused status, and whether the December-quarter numbers show the normal course the company describes.

Informational and educational content only. Not investment advice.