StockWatch
·
Q2 FY-2027 RESULTS · RAJESHEXPO

Rajesh Exports: consolidated PAT falls 75% YoY, 46% QoQ despite 65% revenue surge

PAT -75.38% YoY · revenue +65.28% · margins compressing

Q2 FY27 resultsRAJESHEXPORAJESH EXPORTS LTD.14 Nov 2026 · 3 min read
Revenue

₹2,89,585.4 Cr

+65.28% YoY

PAT (consolidated)

₹25.62 Cr

-75.38% YoY

Net margin

0.01%

0pp YoY

EPS

₹0.86

Rajesh Exports' consolidated PAT for Q2 FY27 (quarter ended September 30, 2026) came in at ₹25.6 Cr (₹25.4 Cr attributable to owners of the parent, ₹0.2 Cr to minority interest) on revenue from operations of ₹2,89,585 Cr. Revenue grew 65.3% YoY (from ₹1,75,212 Cr) and 20.5% QoQ (from ₹2,40,336 Cr in Q1 FY27), but PAT fell 75.4% YoY (from ₹104.1 Cr in the year-ago quarter) and 45.7% QoQ (from ₹47.2 Cr in Q1 FY27) — moving in the opposite direction of revenue. This reverses Q1's narrative: after Q1 FY27 marked the company's first profitable quarter following a string of losses, Q2 shows that turnaround losing steam rather than building on it, even as the topline kept climbing.

The scoreboard

Q2 FY-2027 vs prior quarters

Consolidated P&L, ₹ Crore
Q2 FY-2027QoQYoY
Revenue₹2,89,585.4 Cr+21873.4%+65.3%
Expenses₹2,89,540.79 Cr+21955.6%+65.4%
PAT₹25.62 Cr-45.72%-75.38%
Net margin0.01%-0.9pp0pp
EPS₹0.86+104.8%—

The divergence sits entirely in the margin line. Net profit margin collapsed to ~0.009% of revenue from 0.06% a year ago and ~0.02% in Q1 FY27; EBITDA margin (PBT + depreciation + finance cost, over revenue) fell to ~0.023% from ~0.11% YoY and ~0.03% QoQ. Cost of materials consumed (bullion/gold input cost) alone was ₹2,89,300 Cr — 99.9% of revenue — so in a business with this thin a spread, small swings in input cost or trading volume swamp the profit line; a tax expense of ₹28.8 Cr against PBT of ₹54.4 Cr implies an unusually high effective tax rate of ~53% this quarter, further squeezing what reaches the bottom line. H1 FY27 PAT of ₹72.8 Cr trails H1 FY26's ₹94.5 Cr by ~23%, confirming this isn't a one-quarter blip against an easy base.

₹
44.8655.5566.2376.9187.650.7808-1109-0209-2510-2111-1211-13
The tape into the print — daily closes, last 3 months

The stock went into the print at ₹50.78, down 9.3% over the past month of trading.

₹ Cr
-23.1623.7870.73117.6835.5Q3 FY25rev ₹96,630 Cr-9.53Q1 FY26rev ₹1,31,542 Cr104.05Q2 FY26rev ₹1,75,212 Cr13.48Q3 FY26rev ₹1,956 Cr12.41Q1 FY27rev ₹1,318 Cr25.62Q2 FY27rev ₹2,89,585 Cr
Quarterly consolidated PAT, ₹ Crore

For context: revenue is at a 6-quarter high.

Beyond the headline

What the summary numbers don't show

EPS ₹0.86 (basic & diluted) on 295.26 Cr shares, down from ₹1.59 in Q1 FY27 and ₹3.52 a year ago

There is no formal analyst consensus for this print in the public domain, and management has issued no formal guidance on record — both gaps we flag rather than paper over. Our own pre-result preview had set an on-plan expectation of ~₹35–50 Cr consolidated profit for the quarter; the actual ₹25.4–25.6 Cr misses that range, confirming rather than easing the Street's pre-result Hold/Neutral stance (target ₹210–290, per JM/Kotak) against a stock trading at ₹50.78 and down 95% from its peak. The quarter's other developments sit alongside, not inside, the numbers: SEBI's October 15, 2026 order imposed no fine but required continued cooperation, the company appointed a new Company Secretary and Compliance Officer on October 8, and the 32nd AGM plus FY26 annual report were completed in September — all consistent with a company still working through a regulatory overhang rather than one that has moved past it. The filing itself carries no separate management commentary or press release beyond the statutory board-meeting letter and the standard note that the group reports a single segment (gold products), so there is no company framing to reconcile against the numbers this quarter.

  • W1

    Whether margin compression (OPM ~0.02% this quarter) stabilizes or improves in H2 FY27 — no management guidance on record to benchmark against

  • W2

    Resolution of the SEBI/ED regulatory matters — Oct 15, 2026 order required cooperation but levied no fine; outcome still pending

  • W3

    Whether H2 FY27 can claw back the ~23% H1 PAT shortfall (₹72.8 Cr vs ₹94.5 Cr YoY) to avoid a full-year decline

Figures converted from ₹ Millions (÷10); only a Consolidated statement is filed (Parent + Indian subsidiary + Singapore WOS with two step-down units) — no standalone section exists in this filing; PAT shown is pre-minority-interest (₹25.62 Cr total; owners-of-parent ₹25.38 Cr, NCI ₹0.24 Cr); effective tax rate ~53% is unusually high; no exceptional/one-off items reported in either the current or comparison periods, so no raw/adjusted PAT split applies; our DB's stored prior-quarter comparison (revenue ₹1,317.9 Cr / PAT ₹12.4 Cr / NPM 0.93%) is inconsistent with this filing's own Q1 FY27 column (revenue ₹2,40,335.7 Cr / PAT ₹47.19 Cr) and with web-confirmed Q1 PAT of ₹46.92 Cr — QoQ figures below use the filing's own comparative column instead, which matches the web-confirmed Q1 actual and the YoY column (₹1,752.12 Cr → matches context exactly).

Informational and educational content only. Not investment advice.