Vodafone drive ignites growth, but PAT slumps; BSNL now cautious
The verdict, the claims that held up, the sharpest analyst exchanges, and the risks — the earnings call, decoded from the transcript.
Hold
confidence 6/10
Grade B
BSNL orders missed (186 sites pending 18 months); Vodafone 3,000 target maintained but flagged as conservative, contingent on SBI approval.
Cautiously Optimistic
next 1–2 quarters
Optimistic
multi-year
Q1 delivered 30% topline growth from Vodafone momentum, but net profit fell 16.3%, signalling cost headwinds and accounting pressures offsetting gains. Long-term pathway to ₹100 Cr quarterly revenue is credible if Vodafone funding clears and BSNL Tejas issues resolve, but timeline slipped—FY27 now cautious, FY28+ upside dependent on external customer execution. Management defensive on prior stagnation; PAT margin maintenance claim hedged by IndAS first-five-year notional losses.
₹71 Cr
Revenue · +30% YoY₹14.5 Cr
Reported PAT · −16.3% YoYCompressing
Margins · vs guidance: OverstatedDid the claims hold up?
Strongest quarter-end execution: 150 tenancies in 15 days
MISSQ1 revenue grew 30% YoY but PAT declined 16.3%, offsetting topline gains
Maintained 20% PAT margin, EBITDA at 59.3%
OVERSTATEDNPM reported 19.8%, EBITDA 59.3%; PAT fell despite 30% revenue growth due to IndAS impact + cost escalation
BSNL remains a credible near-term opportunity
MISS186 sites still pending revenue; Tejas equipment issues unresolved; management now cautious, waiting for billing confirmation
3,000 Vodafone tenancies achievable in FY27
MET150 delivered in Q1 (mid-June start); 700 in pipeline; 3,000 is flagged as 'conservative' and conditional on Vodafone funding
Revenue per tower held at ₹31,000 (excluding EV)
METConfirmed at ₹31,000-₹31,500 for last four quarters, maintained despite 'stagnant' Q1
Earnings quality
What changed since the last call
BSNL guidance: bullish → cautious
DowngradeFY26 guidance: BSNL 2-lakh site rollout major upside. Current: 186 sites pending 18 months, Tejas issues unresolved, management will not commit until billing confirmed. Explicit caution: 'let it come on ground.'
FY27 tenancy target: implicit 12,000 → explicit 10,500
DowngradePrior call hinted 12,000+ by year-end. Current: 3,000 from Vodafone + existing 7,000 = 10,000 (later refined to 10,500). Analyst Varun Ghia caught this; mgmt explained 3,000 is 'conservative' based on SBI's ₹6,400 Cr disbursed (vs ₹45,000 Cr plan).
Growth timing: front-loaded → back-loaded
DowngradeVodafone rollout began mid-June; Q2 expected 'lower' due to rain. Management guides: 35-40% H1, 60% H2. Full FY27 growth benefit only in FY28.
PAT margin resilience: 25% claimed → 20% delivered
DowngradeQ1 FY26 had 25% PAT (VI reversal). Q1 FY27: 20% with electricity reclassification + IndAS impact. Management claims sustainable at 20%, but underlying unit economics deteriorating.
The Q&A
Analysts pressed hard on BSNL delays (Saket Kapoor questioned 18-month stagnation, called it 'disappointment'), Vodafone customer concentration risk (Divyansh Thakur: 'whole plan depends on how Vodafone executes'), and PAT margin decline (Mahek Talati: 'why fall from 25% to 20%'). Management remained confident on Vodafone (daily loadings proven), defensive on BSNL (external Tejas issue, not execution), and hedged margins (accounting impacts). MD acknowledged 'two years stagnant,' blamed BSNL payment issues, not ownership. Overall: analysts skeptical, management held tone but ceded ground on BSNL credibility.
Zinc battery & CapEx — Guneet Singh, retail
AnsweredContract manufacturing from GBB Batteries (Kerala plant, ex-Apple battery head). Cost saving ₹48,000 (lithium) → ₹33,000 (zinc). No new revenue; reduces CapEx and operation costs. First deployment Sep 2026.
Vodafone 3,000 tenancy confidence — Mahek Talati, retail
AnsweredVery confident. Daily loadings ongoing, met with Vodafone CTO Jagbir Singh, central team happy. 700+ in pipeline beyond 150 already done. Execution capacity & funds in place.
BSNL order status & delay — Mahek Talati, retail
AnsweredCautious because prior numbers were not achieved due to Tejas equipment issues. Already have orders in hand but not executing. Will only commit once BSNL confirms billing start date and Tejas resolved. Optimistic but protecting credibility.
FY27 tenancy guidance revision — Varun Ghia, institutional
Partial3,000 is conservative based on INR 6,400 Cr Vodafone funded so far. As additional SBI funding approved, will increase target. Committed to 3,000 based on visible funding from SBI phase 1.
PAT margin trajectory — Mahek Talati, retail
AnsweredQ1 FY26 had VI reversal benefit (one-time, 25%). Normal run-rate is 20-21%. IndAS also impacts first 5 years of long-term rentals (notional loss front-loaded, then reverses).
Customer concentration & execution risk — Divyansh Thakur, institutional
DodgedTrue for every company—dependent on customers. Vodafone very aggressive, SBI backing them, Aditya Birla on board. BSNL execution will decide. Waiting on customer confirmations.
BSNL business stagnation & investor returns — Saket Kapoor, institutional
PartialMD: 18-month standstill due to BSNL payment issues, industry headwinds. To jump ahead, must come back 2 steps. Clear vision: hit ₹100 Cr quarterly (₹400 Cr annual) with 10,000 tenancies, grow PAT margin to 24%.
Tenancy ratio & returns on capital — Surbhi Mishra, institutional
AnsweredTargeting 1.8x by FY29 (not 2.0x). Macro sites drive higher tenancy. ROI: 1 tenancy = 3.5-4 yr payback; 2 tenancy = 24 months; 3 tenancy = 18 months. Large PAT jump when sharing ratio rises.
Fibre strategy & margin differentials — Rakesh Gupta, institutional
AnsweredFibre ~5-8% of revenue; similar EBITDA margins as tower IP1 model (70%). Vodafone sites mostly on microwave (no strong fibre network). Fibre upside in future FTTH rollouts, not material in FY27.
BSNL revenue recovery timeline — Anubhav Jain, institutional
AnsweredStarted with 1,000 pending; now 186 (progress slow). Q1 no additions (Tejas busy). Tejas issues in control per recent news; expect Q2 revenue start for 186 sites.
Guidance
FY27 target ₹100 Cr quarterly (₹400 Cr annual) by Q4
MediumCurrently ₹71 Cr/Q; 5.6x growth over 3 quarters. Contingent on 3,000 Vodafone rollout (150 done, 700 in pipeline, 2,150 balance). Rain impact Q2.
FY28: 5,000 additional Vodafone tenancies
MediumVisibility based on SBI phase 2 funding approval (pending). Combined with FY27 3,000 → cumulative 8,000-10,000 tenancies over 2 years.
EBITDA 59.3% maintained in FY27-FY28
MediumElectricity cost normalization already in base. Zinc battery CapEx savings help. But IndAS notional loss on long-term rentals suppresses reported EBITDA first 5 years.
PAT margin 20% expected for full year
LowQ1 delivered 19.8% (below 20% claim). Management hedges: accounting impacts, IndAS muting. Long-term: margin to grow to 24% once 10,000 tenancy base achieved (per MD).
CapEx for 3,000 tenancies: 80% on new towers (2,400), 20% on existing (600)
HighZinc battery saves INR 15,000/site (₹48k → ₹33k). Keeps overall CapEx within budget. Macro site trend supports higher sharing ratio going forward.
Risks the call surfaced
Customer concentration
HighVodafone represents 27% current, targeting 30-32% post-3,000 rollout. Airtel 48% stable (no major rollout). Loss of Vodafone or Airtel's capex pause would cripple growth narrative.
Funding dependency
HighVodafone secured ₹6,400 Cr from SBI; plans ₹45,000 Cr over 18-24 months. Suyog targeting 3,000 tenancies (10% of Vodafone's 30,000 site plan). But only 12,000 sites planned through Sep, and only for ₹6,400 Cr tranche. FY27 3,000 target requires phase 2 funding (₹25,000+ Cr) approval from SBI within next 2 quarters.
BSNL execution uncertainty
HighPrior FY26 guidance suggested BSNL as major upside (2 lakh site 5-year plan, ₹77,000 Cr capex). Current reality: 186 sites pending billing since Q3 FY26, no progress in Q1 FY27. Tejas equipment issues blamed, but management now cautious ('let it come on ground'). BSNL plan now contingent on Tejas resolution confirmation + billing restart, not a credible FY27 catalyst.
Profitability deterioration
HighRevenue ₹71 Cr (+30% YoY) but PAT ₹14.5 Cr (-16.3% YoY). NPM collapsed from 25% (Q1 FY26) to 19.8% (Q1 FY27). Management blames: (1) electricity reclassification, (2) IndAS notional losses on long-term rentals (first 5 years). But underlying costs rising faster than revenue (salaries, battery CapEx, operations).
Execution scale-up risk
Medium3,000 Vodafone tenancies → 80% on new towers (2,400 new towers), 20% on existing (600 anchor). Current base: 6,103 towers. Adding 2,400 new towers = 39% capex increase, revenue deleveraging until tenancy ratio rises (currently 1.2x, targeting 1.8x by FY29). Long payback on new towers (3.5-4 years on single tenancy).
Management
Score 6/10. Mixed. Tushar Shah (Business Head) clear on operational details (Vodafone loading, tenancy breakdowns, CapEx mechanics). Ajay Sharma (CFO) transparent on accounting changes (electricity, IndAS impacts). MD Shivshankar Lature defensive on BSNL miss (blames industry, payment issues, not execution). Avoids quantifying FY27 guidance beyond 3,000 tenancies (cites 'listed entity' rules). Q&A candid but guarded on customer dependencies. Weak on credibility. BSNL: 1,000 sites pending → 186 after 18 months (82% miss, committed billing resolution still pending Q2). Vodafone: 150 tenancies in 15 days (execution proven recently), but FY27 target of 3,000 is downgraded from prior implicit 12,000 estimate and contingent on SBI funding. Track record mixed: good execution on Vodafone, poor on BSNL.
1 · Q2-Q3 FY27
Vodafone Q2-Q4 rollout ramp: target 700+ additional tenancies, 35-40% H1 then 60% H2 backload
2 · Sep 2026
Zinc battery first deployment on 10-15 sites; 50% lower cost (₹33k vs ₹48k lithium)
3 · Q2 FY27
BSNL Tejas equipment resolution expected; 186 pending sites may start contributing revenue
Management defensive on prior stagnation; PAT margin maintenance claim hedged by IndAS first-five-year notional losses.
Informational and educational content only. Not investment advice.