Liberty Shoes Q1FY27: standalone PAT crashes 79% YoY to Rs 0.68 Cr as margins compress
PAT -79.45% YoY · revenue -1.7% · margins compressing
₹169.86 Cr
-1.7% YoY
₹0.68 Cr
-79.45% YoY
0.4%
-1.5pp YoY
₹0.4
Liberty Shoes' standalone PAT for Q1 FY27 (June 2026) fell to Rs 0.68 Cr, down 79.5% YoY from Rs 3.33 Cr and 87.1% QoQ from Rs 5.30 Cr, even as revenue from operations was roughly flat YoY at Rs 169.86 Cr (-1.7%). The 19.9% QoQ revenue drop from Rs 212.05 Cr is largely a seasonal artifact — Q4 (Jan-Mar) is the company's strongest quarter for footwear sell-through — so the YoY comparison, where both revenue and profit are weaker, is the one that matters, and it shows genuine deterioration rather than a sequential blip. There is no formal management guidance on record for this quarter (none in our database, and no prior-quarter outlook statement was found), so the print cannot be graded against a stated target; similarly, no brokerage or consensus estimates specific to this quarter turned up in a search, so vs-street is unknown rather than a beat or miss — Liberty Shoes carries limited formal analyst coverage.
Q1 FY-2027 vs prior quarters
The margin bridge explains the profit collapse: operating margin (OPM) compressed to 7.95% from 9.26% YoY and 9.49% QoQ, and net margin (NPM) fell to 0.40% from 1.92% YoY and 2.50% QoQ. Cost of materials consumed rose to 40.2% of revenue from 37.7% a year ago, employee benefit expense rose to 22.4% of revenue from 20.5%, and finance costs increased 11.4% YoY to Rs 4.25 Cr (2.5% of revenue vs 2.2% YoY) — three separate cost lines all grew as a share of sales while topline was flat to down, squeezing the bottom line from multiple directions simultaneously. Purchases of stock-in-trade also jumped 28.4% YoY, pointing to a heavier mix of third-party sourced (lower-margin) product this quarter. A small Rs 0.15 Cr exceptional charge (versus a Rs 0.04 Cr exceptional gain a year ago) added modest further drag, but adjusting for both leaves PAT still down about 77% YoY, confirming the weakness is structural to the quarter's cost base rather than a one-off.
The stock went into the print at ₹251.55, down 8.2% over the past month of trading.
What the summary numbers don't show
EPS (basic, not annualised) was Rs 0.40 versus Rs 1.95 YoY and Rs 3.11 QoQ.
The results were announced alongside a same-day leadership reshuffle: Executive Director Shammi Bansal resigned from the board and was concurrently appointed President, while Raman Bansal — previously COO — was appointed Additional/Executive Director for three years, and two independent directors (Anand Das Mundhra, Piyush Dixit) were re-appointed for a second three-year term. None of these governance moves are tied to the numbers directly. Separately, the company continues to work through a SEBI-directed review of a promoter reclassification request (communication dated 21 July 2026); the board flagged unresolved questions on Regulation 31A(3)(b)(ii) around control and will forward the application with its own observations to the exchanges — an open item, not something that affected this quarter's P&L. No management press release or commentary accompanying the results was available in the context to cross-check against the numbers.
W1
Cost of materials ratio (40.2% of revenue this quarter, up from 37.7% YoY) — whether it normalises next quarter.
W2
Employee cost ratio (22.4% of revenue vs 20.5% YoY) trajectory following the Aug 10 leadership change (new Executive Director Raman Bansal).
W3
Resolution of the SEBI-directed promoter reclassification review under Regulation 31A — company is to submit its application and the board's observations to the exchanges.
Standalone-only filing (single 'Footwear segment', no consolidated statement). Small exceptional items both periods (current: Rs 0.15 Cr charge; year-ago: Rs 0.04 Cr gain) — adjusted YoY PAT decline (-76.6%) tracks reported (-79.5%) closely, so the drop is organic, not one-off driven. EPS is not annualised per filing note 5.