StockWatch
·
ALL TIME PLASTICS LTD · QQ1 FY-2027 · THE CALL

Volume recovery offset by margin squeeze; pricing rollover ahead

The verdict, the claims that held up, the sharpest analyst exchanges, and the risks — the earnings call, decoded from the transcript.

Q1 FY27 resultsALLTIMEAll Time Plastics Ltd17 Aug 2026 · 6 min read
Verdict

Hold

confidence 6/10

Credibility

Grade B

Hit revenue and volume targets; missed EBITDA recovery narrative. Bamboo on track; US momentum genuine; domestic deliberate pause well-explained.

Short-term outlook

Cautiously Optimistic

next 1–2 quarters

Long-term outlook

Optimistic

multi-year

All Time navigated Q1 supply chaos with solid volume recovery (+25% QoQ) and pricing agreement across most customers, but margin compression (240 bps QoQ, EBITDA -20% YoY) and delayed domestic growth crimp near-term returns. Pricing rollover benefits flow from Q2; bamboo facility and US momentum (19% of revenue) anchor a credible 15-20% FY27 growth thesis, but execution depends on geopolitical stability and capacity ramp discipline.

₹161.7 Cr

Revenue · +2.3% YoY

₹12 Cr

Reported PAT · −6.6% YoY

Compressing

Margins · vs guidance: Mixed

Did the claims hold up?

Management's claims vs. the numbers

25% volume growth QoQ despite supply disruptions

OVERSTATED

6,323 MT vs 5,056 MT Q4 = 25.1% production growth; sales 6,090 vs 5,813 = 4.7%

Gross margin held despite 40-50% raw material inflation

MET

39.5% vs 41.9% Q4 (240 bps compression); only 39.3% Q1 FY26 (flat YoY)

EBITDA margin held broadly flat sequentially

MISS

14.3% vs 14.8% Q4 (50 bps compression); down from 18.2% Q1 FY26 (380 bps YoY)

Pricing agreed with substantiality majority of customers

MET

Domestic 100% passed; largest customer 8-week rollover; 50% of remainder 50% passed

Domestic 30-35% growth target remains on track

OVERSTATED

Q1 domestic flat YoY and QoQ; delayed by deliberate 8-week pricing negotiation pause

Earnings quality

What changed since the last call

Deltas vs. the prior call

US revenue exposure upgraded to 19%

Upgrade

From 12% FY26 to 19% Q1 FY27; growing with marquee accounts, new product inquiries, 'significant opportunity' in discussion

Domestic stalled vs 30-35% growth target

Downgrade

Flat YoY and QoQ at ₹26 Cr; deliberate pause for Khatalwada setup and full price negotiation (8 weeks), but misses near-term guidance

FY27 capacity utilization explicit at 75%

New

New stated working assumption for 41,000 MT base (9 months remaining); hedged as 'current working assumption' given geopolitical risk

Margin recovery delayed 1+ quarter

Downgrade

Gross margin 39.5% (240 bps compression QoQ); EBITDA down 20% YoY; management now guides 'better than last year' for FY27 but no recovery to prior 18-19% until 80% utilization

Bamboo Phase 1 capex 'might increase for next phase'

Neutral

Phase 1 confirmed ₹15 Cr for ₹60 Cr revenue; potential Phase 2 capex noted but not quantified; no change to Phase 1 guidance

The Q&A

Analysts pressed hard on pricing (asked % pass-through), margin guidance (hedged responses on gross vs EBITDA), domestic growth timing (accepted explanation on 8-week pause). Management held firm: pricing confirmed 100% domestic and 50% export (10-15% business), demand strong, Q2+ recovery coming. No concession to downside.

The exchanges that mattered

Supply delay impact — Akshay Chheda, Canara

Answered

Not loss, week-level delays. ₹5.5 Cr spilled to July: ₹3 Cr export, ₹2.5 Cr domestic in transit.

Pricing vs volume growth — Nirali, Unique PMS

Answered

Raw material 40-50%; ₹60-70% of cost to customer; 15% pricing passed on sales. Q2 rollover benefit from largest customer, 50% from remainder, full domestic.

Domestic growth confidence — Ananya Nichani, Thinqwise

Partial

8 weeks for pricing negotiation in Q1; now orders flowing. Domestic 100% price passed; Khatalwada ramp complete; order book full.

Bamboo cannibalization — Rajesh, Raghav Capital

Answered

No; different price points and end consumers. Expands addressable market; opens new customers.

US expansion plans — Anant Mundra, Mytemple Capital

Answered

20-25 stores in 2-3 years; ₹40-50 Lakh per store per month. Import substitution items also opportunity.

Margin recovery timeline — Dev Mehta, Unique PMS

Partial

At 80% utilization. FY27 better than FY26 but won't commit to 16-17%.

Guidance

Forward guidance and management's confidence

FY27 revenue growth 15-20% if situation normalizes

Medium

Anchored on strong order book, pricing confirmed, demand 'better than expected'; contingent on geopolitical stability and raw material normalization

Q1 FY27 ₹161.7 Cr (delivered; 2% YoY)

High

Achieved; reflected supply disruption impact and pricing lag

FY27 EBITDA margin better than FY26; sustainable 18-19% at 80% utilization

Medium

No FY27 specific margin target given; management hedges on product mix and fixed cost absorption; depends on utilization ramp

Gross margin historically 39-40%; product mix dependent

High

Q1 39.5% in line; margin stable YoY despite input inflation absorption; pricing benefits to flow Q2+

₹15 Cr Phase 1 bamboo capex for 3,000 CBM capacity

High

On track; machinery shipped, installation Sep 2026, commercial Q4 FY27

14 injection moulding machines (1,500 MT capacity) expected Q4 FY27

High

Orders placed; arrival Q3, commissioning Q4

4,000 MT additional capacity (total 6,000 MT plan) to be ordered in Q3 based on demand

Medium

Delayed pending project clarity with customers; deliberate to avoid generic investment amid volatility

Bamboo Phase 2 capex 'might increase' (Phase 1 only); not quantified

Low

Forward consideration; Phase 1 ₹15 Cr confirmed

Risks the call surfaced

Ranked by how much they should concern a holder

Geopolitical & supply chain

High

West Asia crisis triggered 40-50% polymer price swings, container non-availability, extended transit times. ₹5.5 Cr Q1 sales deferred by logistics. Hedges on FY27 guidance contingent on normalization.

Capacity utilization & fixed cost

High

EBITDA down 20% YoY despite 25% volume growth; Khatalwada higher fixed cost base not yet absorbed at 65% utilization. Margin recovery requires 75-80% utilization.

Customer concentration

High

Largest customer on structured pass-through with 8-week rollover mechanism; pricing agreed but benefits delayed to Q2. Publicly announced aggressive 20-25 store expansion in India; single-customer revenue concentration implicit.

Domestic growth execution

Medium

Domestic flat YoY and QoQ at ₹26 Cr in Q1; management attributes to deliberate 8-week pricing negotiation pause and Khatalwada ramp. 30-35% growth target now forward-looking (Q2+) but execution unproven.

Bamboo business unproven

Medium

Bamboo Phase 1 commences Q4 FY27 (3,000 CBM capacity); customer samples well-received but commercial viability unproven. Management claims no cannibalization but single company pursuing dual product lines carries execution risk.

Management

Score 7/10. Clear on challenges (geopolitical, supply chain, margin pressure); specific on numbers (pricing % pass-through, volume, utilization, capex). Hedged on macro assumptions ('current working assumption'); transparent on one-quarter domestic delay. Candid Q&A on margin guidance (product mix dependent). Met Q1 revenue and volume targets; missed EBITDA recovery (down 20% YoY) and domestic growth (flat vs 30-35%). Bamboo and US momentum on track. Track record mixed: hits top-line, struggling on margin/leverage.

What to watch next
  • 1 · Q2 FY27

    Pricing rollover benefit from largest customer (8-week lag); domestic orders flowing post-negotiation

  • 2 · Jul 2026

    ₹5.5 Cr deferred Q1 sales recognized; logistics environment normalization expected

  • 3 · Sep 2026

    Bamboo facility machinery installation completed; pre-launch ramp

Pricing rollover benefits flow from Q2; bamboo facility and US momentum (19% of revenue) anchor a credible 15-20% FY27 growth thesis, but execution depends on geopolitical stability and capacity ramp discipline.

Informational and educational content only. Not investment advice.