StockWatch
·

All Time Plastics Ltd

BSE: 544479

P/L Snapshot

Q1 FY27 · standalone

vs Q4 FY26·vs Q1 FY26
Revenue
164.54
+11.8%+3.8%
Expenditure
148.18
+10.3%+4.8%
Net Profit
12.10
+28.8%-5.6%
OPM %
14.29%
-0.50pp-3.91pp

Shareholding

Pattern breakdown

P/L Trends

(in crores)

RevenueExpenditureNet Profit
0.0046.0792.15138.22184.29Q1 FY26Q2 FY26Q3 FY26Q4 FY26Q1 FY27
Price Chart
Reports

Volume Surges, Profit Sinks — Khatalwada's Cost Burden Delays Margin Recovery

margin squeeze · Khatalwada expansion · pricing rollover

Result verdictFollow-upQ1 FY2717 Aug 20266 minConsumer & Retail

Volume recovery offset by margin squeeze; pricing rollover ahead

pricing pass-through · capacity utilization · geopolitical volatility

TranscriptDeep diveQ1 FY2717 Aug 20266 minConsumer & Retail

All Time Plastics Q1 FY27: consolidated PAT down 6.6% YoY to ₹11.96 Cr, margins stay compressed

plastic manufacturing · margin compression · raw material costs

ResultsQ1 FY2706 Aug 20263 minConsumer & Retail
Latest
Quarterly Result5 Aug, 8:30 pm

All Time Plastics Q1 FY27: consolidated PAT down 6.6% YoY to ₹11.96 Cr, margins stay compressed

All Time Plastics posted consolidated revenue of ₹161.69 Cr (+2.3% YoY, +10.9% QoQ) and consolidated PAT of ₹11.96 Cr for Q1 FY27, down 6.6% YoY even as it rebounded 28.2% QoQ off a weak Q4 FY26 base — the YoY decline is the primary read since the QoQ jump is a sequential recovery, not a trend reversal. Standalone PAT was ₹12.10 Cr (EPS ₹1.85) versus consolidated ₹11.96 Cr (EPS ₹1.83), the gap explained by the two loss-making overseas/bamboo subsidiaries. There are no exceptional items in either the current or year-ago quarter, so the YoY decline is on a clean, unadjusted basis. The compression sits on the operating line: consolidated operating margin (EBITDA/revenue) fell to ~14.5% from 18.2% a year ago and is roughly flat versus 14.76% last quarter. Cost of materials consumed grew 5.5% YoY (₹103.46 Cr vs ₹98.07 Cr) against revenue growth of just 2.3%, confirming raw-material cost pressure the company has been flagging since unpassed price hikes began. Employee benefit expense also rose 24% YoY (₹17.08 Cr vs ₹13.77 Cr), likely reflecting IPO-related senior hiring. Partly offsetting this, finance costs fell 55% YoY (₹2.47 Cr vs ₹5.54 Cr) as the company used part of its ₹143 Cr IPO proceeds to prepay borrowings, per note 5 of the filing — net-net this still wasn't enough to hold PBT flat, with consolidated PBT down 5.6% YoY to ₹16.24 Cr. We found no analyst consensus or brokerage preview for this quarter — unsurprising for a company this size, and there is no management press release in our records to cross-check tone against. Against management's own May 2026 guidance (cautiously optimistic short-term, optimistic long-term), the company had explicitly flagged that short-term margin pressure would persist before an expected recovery to 18-19% EBITDA margin in H2 FY27 as capacity utilisation improves; a 14.5% OPM this quarter is consistent with that flagged pressure rather than a fresh miss. The same day as the results, the company classified two relatives of its promoter directors (Akshay Shah, Dhvanit Shah) as Senior Management Personnel — a governance-structure disclosure with no direct P&L impact this quarter. Going into Q2 FY27, the read-through is that margin recovery is now a second-half story: management's 70-75% capacity utilisation target and 18-19% EBITDA margin band for FY27 remain unmet through Q1, and the bamboo initiative's flagged ₹60 Cr revenue potential at full utilisation is not yet visible in a single-segment P&L that doesn't break out bamboo separately.

5 Aug 2026, 08:30 pm

Corporate Events

Board MeetingALLTIME
2026
24Sep

Board Meeting

To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone and Co…

BSE Filing
Board MeetingALLTIME
2026
5Aug

Board Meeting

The Board of Directors meeting is scheduled to consider and …

BSE Filing
Board MeetingALLTIME
2026
22May

Board Meeting

The board meeting is scheduled to consider and approve the A…

BSE Filing