Waterbase's consolidated revenue for Q1 FY27 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) rose 39.4% YoY to ₹121.49 Cr from ₹87.14 Cr, and 53.2% QoQ from ₹79.32 Cr in Q4 FY26. The company swung to a consolidated net profit of ₹1.19 Cr against a loss of ₹3.29 Cr in Q1 FY26 and a loss of ₹3.34 Cr in Q4 FY26, with EPS of ₹0.29 versus -₹0.79 and -₹0.81 respectively. Standalone figures are practically identical (PAT ₹1.19 Cr) since the sole subsidiary, Waterbase Frozen Foods, reported nil revenue and a ₹0.03 Lakh loss for the quarter — immaterial to the group.
Growth was led by the Shrimp Feeds segment, whose revenue climbed to ₹54.56 Cr (from ₹33.69 Cr YoY) with the segment result swinging to a profit of ₹5.65 Cr from ₹1.75 Cr YoY and a ₹1.19 Cr loss in Q4 FY26. Processed Shrimp revenue rose to ₹63.76 Cr from ₹48.19 Cr YoY, though the segment stayed loss-making at -₹2.37 Cr — narrower than the -₹5.37 Cr loss a year ago but wider than the -₹1.93 Cr loss last quarter. Core operating profitability (EBITDA margin, excluding all other income) turned positive at an estimated +2.8% of revenue, against -3.1% YoY and -2.0% QoQ — a genuine, if modest, operating recovery. But ₹0.91 Cr of the ₹1.20 Cr other income this quarter is the one-off provision reversal noted above; stripping it out, PBT falls to roughly ₹0.62 Cr and PAT to about ₹0.28 Cr, meaning the underlying bottom line was only marginally positive rather than the ₹1.19 Cr headline suggests.
No analyst coverage or published consensus estimates for this stock could be located (small-cap, ~4.14 Cr shares outstanding), and management has no formal quarterly guidance on record, so both vsStreet and vsGuidance read as unknown rather than a genuine beat or miss. In its own press release, management framed the quarter as "improved" with a "return to profitability," while flagging rising fishmeal and soybean-meal costs as an ongoing pressure on farmer economics, and separately noted that easing US tariffs have allowed resumption of exports to the US market — consistent with the topline recovery in Processed Shrimp, though that segment has not yet turned profitable. Both statements carry an unmodified (clean) limited-review opinion from Deloitte Haskins & Sells; the board separately approved a routine director reappointment unrelated to operating performance.
Management's own note states results are "not indicative of annual performance" given the seasonal nature of the aquaculture industry — a caution that applies directly to the strong 53.2% QoQ jump, which likely reflects the start of the farming season rather than a structural step-up. The next quarter will show whether the Shrimp Feeds turnaround holds and whether Processed Shrimp narrows its loss as the US export resumption scales.
